MSNBC – Worst Corrupt Media in the World

November 13, 2008

Have you ever wondered where the “investigative” journalists of MSNBC, like David Shuster, do their research for the tales they tell against Republicans, conservatives and the Bush Administration? Corrupt mainstream journalists like Shuster do their research in the very same places as do the investigative journalists of “Slate Magazine,” “Mother Jones Magazine” and “The Los Angeles Times.” The blogosphere! Only problem, instead of reading real blogs like this one, Kerfuffles and Flourishes, the corrupt news reporters read blogs that do not really exist. That makes it very easy for them to get the latest corrupt news they are looking for, instead of having to wade through the truth.

MSNBC retracts false Palin story; others duped:
David Shuster, an anchor for the cable news network, said on air Monday that Martin Eisenstadt, a McCain policy adviser, had come forth and identified himself as the source of a Fox News Channel story saying Palin had mistakenly believed Africa was a country instead of a continent.

Eisenstadt identifies himself on a blog as a senior fellow at the Harding Institute for Freedom and Democracy. Yet neither he nor the institute exist; each is part of a hoax dreamed up by a filmmaker named Eitan Gorlin and his partner, Dan Mirvish, the New York Times reported Wednesday.

Eisenstadt’s “work” had been quoted and debunked before. The Huffington Post said it had cited Eisenstadt in July on a story regarding the Hilton family and McCain.

Among the other victims were political blogs for the Los Angeles Times and The New Republic, each of which referenced false material from Eisenstadt’s blog.

And in July, Jonathan Stein of Mother Jones magazine blogged an item about Eisenstadt speaking on Iraqi television about a casino in Baghdad’s “Green Zone.”

Eitan Gorlin and his partner Dan Mirvish have really stepped into the deep doo-doo. You don’t mess around with the likes of Corrupt MSNBC and expect NOT to be awarded MSNBC’s Badge of Courage – “Today’s Worst People in the World” Award when Keith Olbermann slithers from under his mossy rock to do his Lunatic Fringe Show tonight.

“The Washington Post” must be feeling left out that they were not dupped by the Gorlin/Mirvish Team. Today WaPo has unleashed Howard Kurtz to label Sarah Palin a liar for claiming that the media attacked her family telling viscious lies about her teenage daughter regarding the birth of the Palin’s Down Syndrome baby (The Washington Post). Hello Howard? “The Atlantic Magazine” and NPR are not the media? Howard? Don’t you remember that it was you Howard Kurtz, according to patterico.com, who “demanded” that the McCain Campaign release the medical records of Sarah Palin’s pregnancy to “disprove” the vicious lies made up by the blog Daily Kos? UNBELIEVABLE! Just wondering; did Howard Kurtz ever “demand” to see medical records or even the birth certificate of the person running for President of the United States?

See America’s corrupt media in full battle mode as “The Atlantic Magazine” Attacks a Teenage Child for the “Sins” of Her Mother.


Choose As We Choose

September 3, 2008

Choose As We Tell You

Even though Senator Barack Obama has publicly denounced attacks by Democrats upon the family members of his political opponents, few of his supporters in the media have taken heed, as evidenced by a recent article in Slate Magazine that targets a minor child because she is the daughter of Republican VP nominee, Governor Sarah Palin.

Slate Magazine’s Linda Hirshman is shocked that the teenage daughter of Governor Palin is making such a “Wrong Choice” when she chooses life for her unborn baby:

It’s been a while since I heard of many other 17-year-old middle-class girls making that decision. I’ve heard it almost not at all, actually, since 1973 when the Supreme Court extended constitutional protection to a woman’s decision of “whether to bear or beget a child.”

Slate Magazine’s Ms. Hirshman continues, admonishing the Palin daughter about how her life is now on that wrong track to misery and ruin (“Choose As I Tell You”).

  • Ms. Palin has only a 40% chance of ever graduating from high school.
  • Her chances of ever earning a college degree are less than two in one hundred.
  • Her family is almost doomed to live in poverty, because she is choosing life for her baby.
  • These families are more likely to be on welfare and to require publicly provided health care.
  • Ms. Palin has only a ten percent chance of having the father of the baby marry her, and practically no chance at all that he will ever financially support their baby.
  • Even if she is one of the lucky few mothers who do marry, that marriage is undoubtedly fated to end in divorce.
  • Ms. Palin is also destined to be a smoker, as that is the lot of girls who do not abort their babies.
  • Ms. Palin’s baby will suffer low birth weight.
  • After birth, the child of Ms. Palin will be abused and neglected.
  • When finally ready to attend school, Ms. Palin’s child will do poorly, according to Linda Hirshman.
  • After the stigma of being a poor student, Governor Sarah Palin’s grandchild is “likelier to go to prison and to have teen pregnancies themselves, to stay back a grade, to be involved in violence, to go to foster care.”

With this list of horrors awaiting one’s baby, is there any wonder that half of all pregnant teenage girls choose to kill their unborn child? However, there is no indication of follow-up research on the part of Linda Hirshman to discover exactly how the “unaborted” living survivors feel about their mother’s “Choice” to subject them to the miseries of life. Ms. Hirshman closes by blaming everything on the Republicans: “the cruelty of the Republican position on abortion rights is now graphically laid bare.”

It is interesting to consider that the mother of the Democrat’s current nominee for President, Barack Obama, did not have the guidance of Linda Hirshman, when she was giving birth as a teenager. What would Mrs. Barack Sr. have chosen to do, if only she knew the real horrors that awaited her child? Would she have chosen “The Sanctity of Life” for her unborn child, or would she have chosen the “CHOICE” that none dare name?