When Is Waterboarding Okay?

June 15, 2009

When is Water-Boarding Good? When used against Pro-life Christians, but only if they are drowned at the same time.


That’s right folks. Although America’s Progressive Liberals have proclaimed water-boarding to be “Torture” when used against America’s terrorist enemies, the Pro-Choice movement has advocated the use of water-boarding against Pro-Life Christians, as long as the water-boarding results in drowning. That is because Liberal America considers Pro-life Christians to be the real enemies of their Liberal America nation. That is why children “of color” are being taught by Planned Parenthood to murder other Americans. Remember, water-boarding is supposedly “Torture,” but forcible drowning, as demonstrated to the children in this video, is still “MURDER” in America.

Watch as Planned Parenthood water-boards and drowns (they call it “Aqua-sliding”) a Christian because he teaches abstinence and “dresses funny.” You will see peaceable demonstrators at an abortion clinic shot and killed en-mass by Planned Parenthood. Watch as they water-board a U.S. Senator until he agrees to support Planned Parenthood. If you watch until the end, when the credits roll, you will see Planned Parenthood shoot a U.S. Army helicopter out of the sky. It is proof beyond belief that the violence of abortion practiced at abortion clinics, against vulnerable women and the innocent unborn, promotes more violence against all Americans.

This video is from Planned Parenthood of San Francisco, and was funded by American taxpayers who provide them at least $250,000 every year. Planned Parenthood’s Superhero for Choice kills pro-life Christians and abstinence educators in her never-ending quest to make America safe for abortion. The cartoon video’s message to youngsters “of color” is that white people are evil Christians and Planned Parenthood is their protector. Abort your babies “of color” now! If you wait, it will be too late, for they will be born into this wicked nation that water-boards its enemies.

America’s Superhero for Choice


‘Unexamined Racists’ Vote for McCain

October 31, 2008

McCain Voters are “Unexamined Racists.”  ~~The Obama Campaign

Why does Barack Obama continue to play the Race Card this late in the campaign, when almost everyone agrees that he has already won the election? Why is the Obama Campaign so desperate in late October, that they are sending the following email to John McCain supporters? Did you receive it? 

Basically the email explains to the recipient that if he or she ignores all of the fine and magnificent qualities of Obama and his family and overlooks all the rotten and abominable qualities of John McCain, his wife Cindy and Sarah Palin and her family, then the McCain/Palin voter is suffering from “unexamined racism.” As neither Sarah Palin nor John McCain attended Law School, you are only voting for them because you are a RACIST! Oh, if only Cindy McCain had graduated from Harvard! But she didn’t, therefore there is NO way anyone can vote for John McCain without being a RACIST.

Aside from being called a RACIST, I find this email personally insulting as it slurs the United States Naval Academy where both my husband and son were graduated. I have always been proud of them for that accomplishment and their service in the U.S. Navy. Obama’s supporters consider that military education beneath contempt. Even worse, they attack and condemn the teenage daughter of Sarah Palin, without explaining how Barack Obama would NEVER allow himself to have “an unwed, pregnant teenage daughter.” That is VILE! How low on its belly can the Obama campaign slither, especially since, according to the polls, MSNBC and Doonesbury, they have already won the U.S. Presidency? Today’s email:

From the friend of a friend, these thoughts on racism:

What if John McCain were a former president of the Harvard Law Review?
What if Barack Obama finished fifth from the bottom of his graduating class?

What if McCain were still married to the first woman he said ‘I do’ to?
What if Obama were the candidate who left his first wife after she was disabled and no longer measured up to his standards?

What if Michelle Obama had not only became addicted to pain killers, but acquired them illegally through her charitable organization?
What if Cindy McCain graduated from Harvard?

What if Obama had been a member of the Keating Five?
What if McCain were a charismatic, eloquent speaker?

This is what unexamined racism does.
When there’s a color difference, it rationalizes and minimizes positive qualities in one candidate and de-emphasizes negative qualities in another.

America is facing historic debt, two wars, a world that’s grown to distrust us, a tottering health care system, a weakened dollar, all-time high prison population, mortgage crisis, bank foreclosures, etc. You are the Boss… which team would you hire?

Obama:
Columbia University – B.A. Political Science with a Specialization in International Relations.
Harvard – Juris Doctor, Magna cum Laude

Biden:
University of Delaware – B.A. in History and B.A. in Political Science.
Syracuse University College of Law – (J.D.)

vs.

McCain:
United States Naval Academy (son and grandson of admirals) Class rank:894 of 899

Palin:
Hawaii Pacific University – 1 semester
North Idaho College – 2 semesters
University of Idaho – 2 semesters
Matanuska-Susitna College
University of Idaho – 3 semesters – B.A. in Journalism

PS: What if Barack Obama had an unwed, pregnant teenage daughter….

PS: How could Barack Obama ever have “an unwed, pregnant teenage daughter” as he has the most liberal and radical view on ABORTION as anyone in the entire U.S. Congress? Besides, he has already proclaimed during this campaign that he would never allow his daughters to be “punished with a baby.”


Choose As We Choose

September 3, 2008

Choose As We Tell You

Even though Senator Barack Obama has publicly denounced attacks by Democrats upon the family members of his political opponents, few of his supporters in the media have taken heed, as evidenced by a recent article in Slate Magazine that targets a minor child because she is the daughter of Republican VP nominee, Governor Sarah Palin.

Slate Magazine’s Linda Hirshman is shocked that the teenage daughter of Governor Palin is making such a “Wrong Choice” when she chooses life for her unborn baby:

It’s been a while since I heard of many other 17-year-old middle-class girls making that decision. I’ve heard it almost not at all, actually, since 1973 when the Supreme Court extended constitutional protection to a woman’s decision of “whether to bear or beget a child.”

Slate Magazine’s Ms. Hirshman continues, admonishing the Palin daughter about how her life is now on that wrong track to misery and ruin (“Choose As I Tell You”).

  • Ms. Palin has only a 40% chance of ever graduating from high school.
  • Her chances of ever earning a college degree are less than two in one hundred.
  • Her family is almost doomed to live in poverty, because she is choosing life for her baby.
  • These families are more likely to be on welfare and to require publicly provided health care.
  • Ms. Palin has only a ten percent chance of having the father of the baby marry her, and practically no chance at all that he will ever financially support their baby.
  • Even if she is one of the lucky few mothers who do marry, that marriage is undoubtedly fated to end in divorce.
  • Ms. Palin is also destined to be a smoker, as that is the lot of girls who do not abort their babies.
  • Ms. Palin’s baby will suffer low birth weight.
  • After birth, the child of Ms. Palin will be abused and neglected.
  • When finally ready to attend school, Ms. Palin’s child will do poorly, according to Linda Hirshman.
  • After the stigma of being a poor student, Governor Sarah Palin’s grandchild is “likelier to go to prison and to have teen pregnancies themselves, to stay back a grade, to be involved in violence, to go to foster care.”

With this list of horrors awaiting one’s baby, is there any wonder that half of all pregnant teenage girls choose to kill their unborn child? However, there is no indication of follow-up research on the part of Linda Hirshman to discover exactly how the “unaborted” living survivors feel about their mother’s “Choice” to subject them to the miseries of life. Ms. Hirshman closes by blaming everything on the Republicans: “the cruelty of the Republican position on abortion rights is now graphically laid bare.”

It is interesting to consider that the mother of the Democrat’s current nominee for President, Barack Obama, did not have the guidance of Linda Hirshman, when she was giving birth as a teenager. What would Mrs. Barack Sr. have chosen to do, if only she knew the real horrors that awaited her child? Would she have chosen “The Sanctity of Life” for her unborn child, or would she have chosen the “CHOICE” that none dare name?